(Volume I was posted on September 16. That was ten days before the first debate and about seven weeks following her triumphant coronation at the Philly convention in late July. You should go read it for context in light of her slump here at the finish. Especially if you are still of the mind that a straight Democratic ticket is a good idea.)
Is it the fault of Vladimir Putin and his Russian hackers, who broke into and stole the DNC's e-mail, and then gave the files to Julian Assange, who has leaked them out daily over the past month, revealing Hillary and her subordinates to be ... exactly who we thought she was, and they were? Except even more craven and stupid than we could have imagined?
Is it those wretched Green Party/Jill Stein voters, those damned dirty hippies, all full of their white privilege as they stand poised to repeat the 2000 "history" (sic) of sending a shitty Republican to the White House because they refuse to vote for a shitty Democrat?
(Without question, the most stubborn urban legend ever. I had to correct a few more former Facebook friends again just last night. I'm pretty certain they still don't get it.)
Nope. None of the above. It's all Her. And her supporters, who have driven some Sanders supporters to vote for Trump out of spite for the Hillbots' bad behavior.
(Not me. Though I fought -- and fought hard, for a decade -- to push the Texas Democratic Party to the left, this was the year they yanked the torch and pitchfork out of my hands and ran me off for good. I still didn't vote for any Republicans, however, though there were many fewer Democrats who earned my vote in 2016. That's a pattern I see increasing in the future.)
Here, let's allow Cesar Vargas to explain.
If Hillary Clinton fumbles this sure thing, it's on Her. And all of those with Her.
If she loses, it's all Her fault and the fault of those who attacked everything they saw in opposition, like a pack of rabid dogs. In other words, they acted just like Republicans. They acted worse than Republicans on far too many occasions, but that might only be because I have long given them the benefit of the doubt as being smarter, using critical thinking skills, etc. They stopped doing that, and consequently lost me -- and what appears to be some significant quantity of other Democrats and Democratic voters -- this year.
And I doubt whether they can earn it back.
Is it the fault of Vladimir Putin and his Russian hackers, who broke into and stole the DNC's e-mail, and then gave the files to Julian Assange, who has leaked them out daily over the past month, revealing Hillary and her subordinates to be ... exactly who we thought she was, and they were? Except even more craven and stupid than we could have imagined?
Is it those wretched Green Party/Jill Stein voters, those damned dirty hippies, all full of their white privilege as they stand poised to repeat the 2000 "history" (sic) of sending a shitty Republican to the White House because they refuse to vote for a shitty Democrat?
(Without question, the most stubborn urban legend ever. I had to correct a few more former Facebook friends again just last night. I'm pretty certain they still don't get it.)
Nope. None of the above. It's all Her. And her supporters, who have driven some Sanders supporters to vote for Trump out of spite for the Hillbots' bad behavior.
(Not me. Though I fought -- and fought hard, for a decade -- to push the Texas Democratic Party to the left, this was the year they yanked the torch and pitchfork out of my hands and ran me off for good. I still didn't vote for any Republicans, however, though there were many fewer Democrats who earned my vote in 2016. That's a pattern I see increasing in the future.)
Here, let's allow Cesar Vargas to explain.
It took me a long time to write this. I had to dig deep into my being to come up with these words. I’m recanting my endorsement of Hillary Clinton for the presidency.
I’m aware of how vindictive Clintonians can be. I’m not speaking about the Clintons themselves, but of those surrounding them. Perhaps the saying is true: dime con quién andas y te diré quién eres.
Your staff, your donors, your surrogates, and those you surround yourself with are a reflection of who you truly are, no? If not, why not curb any unacceptable behavior? Silence, indifference, or inaction is as incriminatory -- at least to me.
There has been no repudiation, let alone denunciation, of what was said in those emails-just denial, finger pointing, and doublespeak. To appoint the very same folks who carried out many malicious behaviors to tip the scales for Hillary is just as unpardonable. Why reward unethical behavior? It’s mind-boggling.
I rebuke with my heart, mind, and soul all the twisted narratives of sexism, misogyny, racism, and classism lay at our feet. Though some of them are legitimate, most were used to derail derail valid grievances from our communities and completely erase us. Our voices were drowned out by empty accusations, by a nefarious usage of identity politics recommended by one of our own, no less. That is a bamboozling of POC and unsuspecting allies. This is why Hillary Clinton doesn’t deserve our vote, among many other reasons.
If Hillary Clinton fumbles this sure thing, it's on Her. And all of those with Her.
Bernie Sanders was treated horribly by the DNC, the Clinton crew, and the Obama administration, and by proxy, many of us were also stung. Without any apologies. In fact, we received nothing but contempt from the Clinton campaign and her surrogates. Then they expected us to fall in formation. Many of us did. I said I would endorse Hillary if she won the primary fair and square. And I did, but that was before I got a hold of all the highly unethical things that happened to get her to win.
I’m not telling you not to vote for her. I’m aware of what is at stake. The Supreme Court and a petulant man-child that might quicken the apocalypse, I know. I’m telling you that I’m no longer endorsing her. Vote with your conscience. Vote strategically. Or don’t. It’s your prerogative.
If she loses, it's all Her fault and the fault of those who attacked everything they saw in opposition, like a pack of rabid dogs. In other words, they acted just like Republicans. They acted worse than Republicans on far too many occasions, but that might only be because I have long given them the benefit of the doubt as being smarter, using critical thinking skills, etc. They stopped doing that, and consequently lost me -- and what appears to be some significant quantity of other Democrats and Democratic voters -- this year.
And I doubt whether they can earn it back.
1 comment:
This is also on the DNC bosses and the super-delegates in particular. Even with Hillary winning a plurality of pledged delegates, the supers could have looked at some poll numbers and chosen a far less shitty Democrat who had a better chance of defeating whichever doofus the GOP nominated.
If you ever need evidence that establishment Democrats are still suffering from post-McGovern fear of the Left, look at how the supers circled the wagons around Hillary from the get-go. And then consider how the candidacies of Jesse Jackson, Howard Dean, Dennis Kucinich, and even Patricia Schroeder were either sabotaged or non-starters.
Post a Comment