-- Greg Abbott asks for some guidance (via Quorum Report).
Update (10/11): And guidance is supplied.
-- Chad Dunn, the TDP lawyer who makes his living doing this, weighs in (via Lone Star Project):
I guess some attorneys are going to be working over the weekend.
While it is obvious that the federal court in Corpus Christi has rejected Texas' voter ID law as discriminatory and a de facto poll tax, it failed to issue a judgment instructing the state on required procedures, if any, for the November election.
The Office of the Attorney General has issued a request for guidance on the initiation and scope of the injunction and whether it will be implemented for this election. The request notes "The issuance of an opinion with no injunction or direction regarding the timing of the injunction is already adding to the confusion created by the Court’s decision. Texas respectfully requests that the Court enter the planned injunction and judgment by the close of business today."
The request for guidance can be found here.
Update (10/11): And guidance is supplied.
-- Chad Dunn, the TDP lawyer who makes his living doing this, weighs in (via Lone Star Project):
LSP: Greg Abbott has already announced that he will appeal Judge Ramos’ ruling to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. How long will that process take, and what happens after the 5th Circuit rules?
CD: We expect Judge Ramos to issue an order formally blocking enforcement of the Texas voter ID law within the next few days. Greg Abbott has already announced that he will appeal her ruling and ask the 5th Circuit US Court of Appeals to reverse her order. After the 5th Circuit rules, the case will almost certainly be appealed to the US Supreme Court. It would not surprise me if both the 5th Circuit and the Supreme Court issue rulings on this matter in next ten days. (emphasis mine)
I guess some attorneys are going to be working over the weekend.
No comments:
Post a Comment