Not talking about the White House chances yet. Just the Democratic ticket (and the yard signs, the bumper stickers, and all that swag).
Who said it first? I know I said it 18 months ago. If you're thinking progressive, though, you'd still be mistaken. Castro is as centrist and cautious as they come. Still, the race in Texas would be exciting, liven things up a lot for Democrats down the ballot, like Pete Gallego for one. Should help the Ds a great deal locally, especially if Ed Gonzales runs for Harris County sheriff, for another.
The GOP would have to match that, so my early money goes on a Walker-Rubio ticket. I'm guessing Ted Cruz is less likely to be involved because he's just too nuts for moderate conservatives (sic). And it's about 18 months until we vote in November of 2016, so remember you heard that Republican pairing here first.
Update: The Hill, via Pensito Review, list the ten Senate races Democrats are mostly likely to flip in 2016. Wisconsin moved to the top of the list with Russ Feingold's announcement last week.
Update II: If you prefer a more cynical take on Clinton-Castro 2016, then read Joe Concha.
Henry Cisneros, who was Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for former President Bill Clinton, adds more fuel to the growing fire that former San Antonio Mayor and current HUD Secretary Julián Castro is at the top of Hillary Clinton's list of potential vice presidential running mates.
"What I am hearing in Washington, including from people in Hillary Clinton’s campaign, is that the first person on their lists is Julián Castro," said Cisneros, according to the transcript of an interview taped with Univision's Al Punto.
The public affairs show airs on Sundays at 10 a.m. on Univision 23-WLTV in Miami.
"... They don’t have a second option," said Cisneros, "because he is the superior candidate considering his record, personality, demeanor and Latin heritage."
Who said it first? I know I said it 18 months ago. If you're thinking progressive, though, you'd still be mistaken. Castro is as centrist and cautious as they come. Still, the race in Texas would be exciting, liven things up a lot for Democrats down the ballot, like Pete Gallego for one. Should help the Ds a great deal locally, especially if Ed Gonzales runs for Harris County sheriff, for another.
The GOP would have to match that, so my early money goes on a Walker-Rubio ticket. I'm guessing Ted Cruz is less likely to be involved because he's just too nuts for moderate conservatives (sic). And it's about 18 months until we vote in November of 2016, so remember you heard that Republican pairing here first.
Update: The Hill, via Pensito Review, list the ten Senate races Democrats are mostly likely to flip in 2016. Wisconsin moved to the top of the list with Russ Feingold's announcement last week.
Update II: If you prefer a more cynical take on Clinton-Castro 2016, then read Joe Concha.
3 comments:
I'll still disagree on this, on the grounds that rather than make the Clinton ticket more youth-appealing, it will make Clinton herself look O-L-D.
She's going to look old no matter what. It's not for young people anyway; they only turned out for Obama. It's for Colorado, and Arizona, and Nevada, and Texas cities, and Mexicano-laden precincts and counties across the country.
You may be right on that. That said, she has shown herself to generally like "safe" political choices in the past. ...
And, will a slick neolib urban Hispano really turn up the youth that much? Especially outside of "tonier" urban and suburban areas? Maybe ... we shall see.
Post a Comment