Matt Angle telegraphed it last week, and the Texas Democrat who earned the most votes statewide in 2008 confirmed it yesterday. Careful parsing by the folks at First Reading reveals the distinction in the assertion.
Houston is light years ahead of the three stooges in the GOP primary scrambling to replaceWheelchair Coathanger Ken. This blog has already pulled the curtain away from Barry Smitherman many times, and yesterday Dan "Curly" Branch stepped up to make his case.
Well, he has been getting out-kooked, after all. At least Don Quixote could find a windmill to tilt.
It's now Ken Paxton's turn to do or say something ridiculously ignorant. We shouldn't have to wait very long.
This is very artfully done. When I first read this I assumed it meant that Houston ran ahead of President Obama in Texas. In fact, he did get a slightly higher percentage of the vote - 45.88 percent to 43.68 for Obama. But his vote total - 3,525,141, lagged ever-so-slightly behind Obama's 3,528,633. But Angle's statement is perfectly accurate because Houston did win more votes than any other "Texas Democratic candidate," because neither Barack Obama nor Joe Biden is a Texan.
Houston is light years ahead of the three stooges in the GOP primary scrambling to replace
State Rep. Dan Branch announced Thursday his proposal to create a Voter Fraud Task Force if elected as Attorney General.
“I have a clear plan to attack voter fraud in Texas,” Branch, R-Dallas, said in a press release.
Branch said the task force would:
”closely monitor the activities of groups that would seek to subvert ballot integrity
appoint a Special Counsel devoted to exposing and prosecuting any instance of voter fraud, and
aggressively defend the landmark Texas voter ID law from the Obama Administration’s spurious attempt to invalidate it.”
Well, he has been getting out-kooked, after all. At least Don Quixote could find a windmill to tilt.
It's now Ken Paxton's turn to do or say something ridiculously ignorant. We shouldn't have to wait very long.