It was the worst act of terrorism on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001, and the deadliest attack on a gay target in the nation’s history, though officials said it was not clear whether some victims had been accidentally shot by law enforcement officers.
It's a hate crime against gays. No, wait: it's radical Islamist terrorism -- and that means it's Obama's fault; after all, he sort of predicted it less than two weeks ago, AND Ted Cruz and Donald Trump both said so. They're probably not altogether wrong about that, either; is this sick enough for you yet? I just hope the president doesn't say "that's not who we are", because it's precisely who we are.
“Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism,” (Drumpf) wrote. “I don’t want congrats, I want toughness & vigilance. We must be smart!”
'Smart' is just not going to be possible for you and your ilk, Don. Ever. What's your Plan B?
I'm still #FuckTheNRA, personally.
The vast majority of guns used in 16 recent mass shootings, including two guns believed to be used in the Orlando attack, were bought legally and with a federal background check. At least eight gunmen had criminal histories or documented mental health problems that did not prevent them from obtaining their weapons.
Go ahead take a look, then filter it through the reality of the same old politicos posting the same meaningless #ThoughtsandPrayers on their social media accounts while they deposit another check from Wayne LaPierre. Keep in mind that, like Dan Patrick, some people believe their thoughts and prayers were answered when more than a hundred Latinos/as, many of them LGBT, were struck down by bullets early yesterday morning.
As an atheist, my question is: why do you want to worship such a god as that?
Want to read more Tweets like that one above? Here you go.
Not bothered enough yet?
Some Hillbots thought it would be primo to take a shot at Bernie Sanders over his gun policy. And some Sandernistas fired right back with a full clip at Hillary:
“This is the deadliest mass shooting in the history of the United States and it reminds us once more that weapons of war have no place on our streets.”
But those “weapons of war” have been used on the streets of Iraq and in midnight raids on the civilian population in the war there that Hillary so ardently backed.
Does she even grasp what she is saying? She is saying that it is an atrocity to use such weapons on Americans – but not on the brown people, civilians in their homes, in Iraq and throughout the greater Middle East and North Africa in U.S. wars of aggression and the occupation. To be horrified by the use of those weapons on Americans but not on Arabs qualifies as racism of the basest sort.
Not ugly enough for you yet? Want more?
Sorry but I can't take any more. Here's some Onion-style satire, this is my stop.
ORLANDO, FLORIDA (The Nil Admirari) - Today, a number of Americans and corporate news outlets were not intentionally being sarcastic when they described the latest mass shooting in the United States as "unbelievable" and "shocking."
"This is unbelievable. This kind of thing never happens in the United States," said Mandy Hammer, who awoke this morning from a coma she had been in for over fifty years.
The corporate media in the United States routinely used the word "shocking" to characterize yet another mass shooting in America, which boasted a historic body count.
Maxwell Keene, a Harvard University English professor, told TNA he was unaware of changes to the English language that would make either word appropriate to use.
A press release by the National Rifle Association informed Americans more guns would fix the epidemic of gun violence in America.
Congress confirmed any meaningful gun control remained hopelessly out of reach.