Let's get Trail Blazers' take, since they were first (after the actual sponsor, that is):
WaPo's poll from just this past weekend begs to differ on the rapidity with which Sandernistas are boarding the Clinton bandwagon. So Jim Henson may just be spinning here.
Whether that happens or doesn't, what I'm gathering from social media is that Berners aren't waiting to be led anywhere. I believe Henson's supposition is false, but time (and more data) will tell. Here's the counterpoint.
Accurate, and it doesn't reference the platform arguments that Sanders' people lost over the weekend, and some seething I'm seeing about that. So is WaPo's poll wrong about Berners jumping on with Clinton and TexTrib's right here?
And there's the usual caveats about polling methodology.
And the DMN's political blog buried the lede ...
That's going to excite all those Democrats who believe Hillary when she says "I can win Texas". But hey, if you were ignorant enough to have swallowed all her lies up to this point... why would you suddenly stop now?
The head-to-head matchup is presenting itself as a very skewed and blinkered way to look at this election cycle. In a three-horse race (with Lib Gary Johnson), it's 39-32-7, with 14% saying 'someone else'. And this poll neglects mentioning Jill Stein or the Green Party completely, which I think is flawed methodology especially when you consider the wildest of UT/TexTrib/YouGov polling results over their relatively long history of comical errors. Even if you're a Democrat who is hostile to Greens, it's a dumb thing to do to simply ignore them (or hide their support in other ways). And we'll probably see more of that.
More from the Austin Statesman.
*Disclosure: I was surveyed for this poll by YouGov.
Texas supporters of Bernie Sanders are more reluctant to support Hillary Clinton than Ted Cruz supporters are to support Donald Trump, according to a new poll released Monday morning.
The University of Texas / Texas Politics Project Poll found Texas voters who supported Cruz's presidential campaign are more likely to support Trump than Sanders supporters are to support Clinton. Nearly 70 percent of Cruz voters are ready to vote for Trump, but just 40 percent of Sanders supporters are ready to vote for the former secretary of state.
WaPo's poll from just this past weekend begs to differ on the rapidity with which Sandernistas are boarding the Clinton bandwagon. So Jim Henson may just be spinning here.
"Sanders has been reluctant to throw in the towel and endorse Clinton. That's showing in these numbers," said James Henson, a UT-Austin professor and the director of the Texas Politics Project. "Clinton has plenty of time to work with Sanders and his supporters. But I think the ball is very much in Sanders' court right now. The Sanders' voters are likely in large numbers to follow the lead of their candidate. But he's gotta lead them to that place."
Whether that happens or doesn't, what I'm gathering from social media is that Berners aren't waiting to be led anywhere. I believe Henson's supposition is false, but time (and more data) will tell. Here's the counterpoint.
Since Clinton became the presumptive nominee, Sanders has refused to concede. While acknowledging that he's not going to be the nominee and that he'll likely vote for Clinton in November, the Vermont senator hasn't dropped out yet. He has also not formally endorsed Clinton.
Accurate, and it doesn't reference the platform arguments that Sanders' people lost over the weekend, and some seething I'm seeing about that. So is WaPo's poll wrong about Berners jumping on with Clinton and TexTrib's right here?
And there's the usual caveats about polling methodology.
The poll was conducted online from June 10 to June 19 and surveyed 1,200 voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.83 percent meaning that results can vary by that much in either direction. Some public opinion experts question the effectiveness of online polling, because it relies on "sample matching."
This statistical tool draws samples from online groups of pre-selected respondents and weighs them to represent demographic groups.
Typically, the best polls are conducted over telephone. Still, the University of Texas / Texas Politics Project Poll provides interesting insight into the upcoming general election.
And the DMN's political blog buried the lede ...
Trump leads over Clinton 41 to 33 percent, according to the poll.
That's going to excite all those Democrats who believe Hillary when she says "I can win Texas". But hey, if you were ignorant enough to have swallowed all her lies up to this point... why would you suddenly stop now?
The head-to-head matchup is presenting itself as a very skewed and blinkered way to look at this election cycle. In a three-horse race (with Lib Gary Johnson), it's 39-32-7, with 14% saying 'someone else'. And this poll neglects mentioning Jill Stein or the Green Party completely, which I think is flawed methodology especially when you consider the wildest of UT/TexTrib/YouGov polling results over their relatively long history of comical errors. Even if you're a Democrat who is hostile to Greens, it's a dumb thing to do to simply ignore them (or hide their support in other ways). And we'll probably see more of that.
More from the Austin Statesman.
*Disclosure: I was surveyed for this poll by YouGov.
