Alas,
it is finished.
Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul,
the longtime Texas congressman who marshaled an American tea party
movement, won't get to have a last word -- at least not at the GOP
national convention next month.
His futile effort over the
weekend to get enough delegate votes to secure a speaking spot at the
convention marks the end of the road for the 76-year-old candidate who
tried and failed three times to win the presidency, relying upon the
unflappable courtesy of a career physician and the iron-clad commitment
to a libertarian ideology that endeared him to young and old followers
alike.
So long, Dr. No. We hardly knew ye.
As for the nascent Paulista movement, though they will probably take their bongs and go home, there remain plenty of good Plan B options.
There's a fine Libertarian candidate, former NM Gov. Gary Johnson and his running mate, CA district judge Jim Gray. I wrote about them
here. Particularly for the Weed Caucus, this ticket is very encouraging. Johnson makes Romney's path to Electoral College victory much more difficult throughout the Mountain West states, not just in New Mexico.
Update:
this poll, showing
Johnson drawing 13% of the New Mexico vote, suggests the Libertarian is earning the support of Dem-leaning independents.
The Green Party has fielded two excellent progressive populists, Dr. Jill Stein and homeless advocate/activist Cheri Honkala. I have
written a lot lately about
them, and
so has the
Traditional Media over the
past week. Their strongest platform is economic: the
Green New Deal -- rebuilding the country's infrastructure, providing well-paying jobs and healthcare for Americans while dismantling the creeping corporatism in our government -- is a worthy goal for the benefit of the 99%.
And for the truly freak right, there's a
nutjob Constitution Party candidate
that makes the Teabags appear closer to the statistical mean in terms of
sanity. Read
this article to see why Virgil Goode will likely keep Romney out of the White House -- by tipping Virginia to the Ds, upsetting
Karl Rove's strategy -- no matter what else may happen between now and November.
All those
and potentially others will be on your ballot in the fall for people who seriously consider themselves not-Romneys and not-Obamas. Voting against
some one or the other is no way to elect leaders to run this great
nation. Voting for the "lesser of two evils" is still voting for 'evil'.
Texas won't be in play, electorally speaking, for the
usual reason: low-information conservative lemmings who like to spend less than 5
minutes on their citizenship responsibility every four years by voting a
straight R ticket.
Don't be that guy (or girl).
This advice is meant for a wider audience than just the Ron Paul folks: Democracy -- and our Republic -- is best served when people vote for
candidates who come the closest to representing their views, be those views right or
left, far right or far left. Voting for a Libertarian or a Green, or even a Constitutioner, sends
the message to the Democrats and the Republicans that they cannot take
your vote for granted.
Casting a mindless vote for the two-party duopoly instead of the best man or woman running -- and that includes races down your ballot -- is the only thing worse than not voting at all.
Update: The Libertarian Party,
via e-mail to its supporters, emphasizes the 'golden opportunity NOW to bring Ron Paul supporters into the LP'.