Best 2016 development of the week, as far as I'm concerned.
So unlike Bernie Sanders, she will run as a spoiler. Don't worry, though, Hillary fans; I doubt you'll be able to blame another Green wrongly for "siphoning off" votes.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your candidate if you suddenly find yourself in October of 2016 whining about not having any good options. A vote for Stein is much better for people who might cast a ballot for Mickey Mouse or Pat Paulsen or Hypnotoad, or some other protest vote, since they cannot abide the establishment-preferred, consultant-recommended duopoly nominees. Console yourself, neoliberals; in the "siphon off" illusion, even the Libertarian (I'm thinking Gary Johnson at this point, just like last time) will get about three times as many votes as Stein. Just like last time.
Five percent of the national vote would be amazing, three percent would be real progress, but anything better than four years ago will still represent only the smallest, softest voices for changing a system buried under an avalanche of Supreme Court-approvedspeech money from the Kochs, et.al. They remain voices that need to be heard, ideas that need to be discussed. I'll consider it a monumental advance if Stein and Johnson are allowed to participate in the presidential debates. The primary obstacle to overcome isn't getting the message out; it's changing hearts and minds about "wasting" one's vote and various other truisms, myths, and urban legends in that regard. Greens are making great headway in Europe; along with associated issues like banning fracking (good news, natural gas exporters!) and GMOs, they're even gaining seats in Parliament, so perhaps there's still hope left for us here in the United States.
We can assert that Texas will be last as always in terms of progress. That won't stop anybody from making the effort, from fighting the battle that needs to be fought. Democrats in off-presidential election years -- and Republicans in presidential ones -- ought to be able to relate to that.
Update: Indy Political Report with the press release, and Irregular Times and jobsanger with more.
Most voters will likely never know her name, let alone cast a vote for her at the ballot box, but that’s not deterring Dr. Jill Stein from running for president in 2016.
Stein was the Green Party’s presidential nominee in 2012 and is expected to announce Friday the she’s exploring another White House bid in 2016.
Prior to making the announcement, Stein sat down exclusively with “Power Players” to explain why she’s stepping forward as an alternative to the current field of likely presidential contenders that she characterizes as “corrupt and sold out.”
“There are rules that make it possible for the very rich to buy politicians and that's what's going on,” Stein said. “There's a horse race around grabbing the money right now, and I think it speaks volumes about what a really sorry state our political system has come to.”
So unlike Bernie Sanders, she will run as a spoiler. Don't worry, though, Hillary fans; I doubt you'll be able to blame another Green wrongly for "siphoning off" votes.
In her 2012 campaign, Stein received fewer than half a million votes across the country – less than 1 percent of the total popular vote – and was even arrested for trying to get into a televised debate from which she was excluded.
Stein recalled the arrest – and subsequent holding – as “the most bizarre experience you can imagine.”
“For trying to get into that debate, I was actually arrested, taken to a dark site where no one knew where I was - the site was secret - and held handcuffed to metal chairs for approximately eight hours,” Stein said. “It speaks volumes about how terrified the political system is that the voices of principled opposition may actually get heard."
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your candidate if you suddenly find yourself in October of 2016 whining about not having any good options. A vote for Stein is much better for people who might cast a ballot for Mickey Mouse or Pat Paulsen or Hypnotoad, or some other protest vote, since they cannot abide the establishment-preferred, consultant-recommended duopoly nominees. Console yourself, neoliberals; in the "siphon off" illusion, even the Libertarian (I'm thinking Gary Johnson at this point, just like last time) will get about three times as many votes as Stein. Just like last time.
Five percent of the national vote would be amazing, three percent would be real progress, but anything better than four years ago will still represent only the smallest, softest voices for changing a system buried under an avalanche of Supreme Court-approved
We can assert that Texas will be last as always in terms of progress. That won't stop anybody from making the effort, from fighting the battle that needs to be fought. Democrats in off-presidential election years -- and Republicans in presidential ones -- ought to be able to relate to that.
Update: Indy Political Report with the press release, and Irregular Times and jobsanger with more.