Earlier this week a handful of us local blog-types sat down with TCR prez Bob Eckels, outreach director David Hagy, and press spox David Benzion to get an update on the bullet train they're planning for the Houston-Dallas corridor.
I won't bury the lede; color me cautiously optimistic. If you wish, watch some of Eckels giving essentially the same pitch elsewhere that we got here.
A summary, courtesy to me from Charles Kuffner -- who has led in the early reporting -- because my audio capabilities were somewhat impaired during our gathering:
Again, my initial take here with respect to the ecological concerns is a dash of skepticism. After our meeting, my brother Neil expressed some regret that he had not asked about the Houston toad, an endangered species that lives in some of the area likely to be transited by the bullet train and already experiencing stress from roadways, pipelines, transmission lines and the construction of all those.
Overall, this "socialist" can get on board with the Texas Central Railway, especially if it expands service to those Texans who are not part of the "luxury" class. Even if it remains an elite mode of transportation affordable by only the 1%, though, it wins environmentally by getting cars off the road and squeezing yet more efficiency from the airlines.
How the Railway handles their security, TSA-style and along the physical line itself, is a question that still needs an answer.
Mayors Annise Parker of Houston, Mike Rawlings of Dallas, and Betsy Price of Fort Worth are hosting media at Houston's city hall this morning to make an announcement about high speed rail. Isiah Carey at Fox 26 has posted the press release, and I'll add anything they have that I don't afterwards.
Update: Here's the Chron's take.
The caption of thephoto oops, 'photo illustration' above of a Japanese bullet train reads: "The planned high-speed rail line between Houston and Dallas would use
overhead electrical lines and its own separated tracks to shuttle riders
between the two metro areas, through mostly flat, rural land." I interpret that as mostly at-grade. I wonder if we will hear the same conservative whining that we have endured for the last decade about Houston Metro's light rail service.
Update II: Posted in the comments to this news in another forum, this Wiki link relates the long, tortured history of high speed rail in Texas. It should be interesting to see if some of the same old coalitions line up to stifle it again.
Update III: CultureMap covered this morning's presser, and Texas Leftist -- who was with me at the meeting earlier in the week -- filed his story.
I won't bury the lede; color me cautiously optimistic. If you wish, watch some of Eckels giving essentially the same pitch elsewhere that we got here.
A summary, courtesy to me from Charles Kuffner -- who has led in the early reporting -- because my audio capabilities were somewhat impaired during our gathering:
-- TCR is privately funded and they expect to be profitable if only the proposed Houston to Dallas route gets built. They will build with future expansion in mind and to accommodate connections with future rail systems, including one that is probably highest in priority, linking Dallas to Fort Worth. (See below for the link to today's press conference with the mayors of H-Town, Big D, and Cowtown.)
-- There will be rail stations in downtown Houston and Dallas, and perhaps a handful of others elsewhere in both cities. Depending on the ultimate route chosen -- there are three possible alignments -- there may be a stop in-between, in Bryan/College Station or Huntsville or some other city.
-- Going private means, among many other considerations, that they could plan the route and station locations without having to take political considerations and consequences into account. The TCR will be still regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration, and once they submit their intent to build to the FRA (next month), they will go through the environmental impact study and public hearing process just as TxDOT or Metro or any other public agency would.
-- My question to Judge Eckels in our meeting was about eminent domain. His response was that they will have that capability, but their preference is to make the kind of offer people will want to accept, as that is cheaper than involving attorneys (and certainly better from a PR perspective). They will mostly be using existing railroad rights of way and don't expect to have to usurp the property of too many landowners.
Frankly, this response suggests a prescription for some pretty thick rose-colored glasses. The obstacles will sprout like weeds as soon as their route gets published. Will the train be elevated in rural areas, minimizing the danger of crossings? Surely it's not going to be constructed mostly at-grade -- dangerous for country travelers -- or below, which would seemingly be the most expensive and present challenges of unexpected kinds. (These are questions I wished I had asked, and will pose to communications director Benzion.)
-- So far the project has not encountered opposition they have been unable to overcome. When they held a similar get-together with Houston-area conservo-bloggers, the primary reaction there was suspicion that their plan would evolve to securing taxpayer funding. Noteworthy here was Eckels' emphasis on efforts to keep politics out of the project, and particularly the politics of the far right minimized. He wants the Railway to neither be tarred with an "Obama" brush nor be touted as some strain of 'Texas exceptionalism'. This is an admirable goal and a challenging mission, IMHO.
Eckels also says that environmental groups 'like' them, and that they have good relationships with the FRA and with other rail builders such as the one in California.
Again, my initial take here with respect to the ecological concerns is a dash of skepticism. After our meeting, my brother Neil expressed some regret that he had not asked about the Houston toad, an endangered species that lives in some of the area likely to be transited by the bullet train and already experiencing stress from roadways, pipelines, transmission lines and the construction of all those.
Overall, this "socialist" can get on board with the Texas Central Railway, especially if it expands service to those Texans who are not part of the "luxury" class. Even if it remains an elite mode of transportation affordable by only the 1%, though, it wins environmentally by getting cars off the road and squeezing yet more efficiency from the airlines.
How the Railway handles their security, TSA-style and along the physical line itself, is a question that still needs an answer.
Mayors Annise Parker of Houston, Mike Rawlings of Dallas, and Betsy Price of Fort Worth are hosting media at Houston's city hall this morning to make an announcement about high speed rail. Isiah Carey at Fox 26 has posted the press release, and I'll add anything they have that I don't afterwards.
Update: Here's the Chron's take.
The caption of the
Update II: Posted in the comments to this news in another forum, this Wiki link relates the long, tortured history of high speed rail in Texas. It should be interesting to see if some of the same old coalitions line up to stifle it again.
Update III: CultureMap covered this morning's presser, and Texas Leftist -- who was with me at the meeting earlier in the week -- filed his story.