There aren't any other huge surprises in this (historically unreliable) data.
I think Henson has that accurate; Alameel's voluminous mailings and TV ads should get him into the lead by the time all the votes are counted. But I warned a couple of my EVBB friends week before last that I feared an Alameel/Rogers runoff, and now it looks like I'm left to hope that the TexTrib's polling lives up to its comically bad reputation. However there's greater confidence to be found in their other numbers...
-- Abbott 47, Davis 36, Don't know 17. About right, I would say. Update: And yes, it is worth noting that this poll concluded before the Ted Nugent crap exploded (pun intended), so the effect of the most significant development of the entire campaign is not reflected here.
-- Cornyn 62, Stockman 16, everybody else in single digits that total 15. Also about right, and in defiance of what was released last week (somebody is awfully wrong, that's for sure). The Conservative News distribution probably doesn't save Stockman, either.
-- Dewhurst 37, Patrick 31, Staples, 17, Patterson 15. Nothing to quarrel over here, either. Remains to be seen whether Patrick's Ill Eagle flap hurts him; that news also broke after the poll concluded. But if something like these numbers hold, Dewhurst is toast in the runoff. Let's note this also.
That seems like a sensible set of figures for late February, too. The only other result that so much as raises my eyebrow is Tea Party queen Debra Medina laying waste to the well-funded men in the R comptroller race.
There's going to be some crying at Glenn Hegar's watch party on Election Night. Hope he doesn't feel the urge to have to shoot anything.
Update: Socratic Gadfly with more on what this might mean for the Green Party Senate candidate, who also needs some free media but isn't well-positioned to take advantage of the publicity. And Charles breaks things down as well.
In the Democratic primary, the candidate who has been on the ballot the most times, Kesha Rogers, leads the best-financed candidate, David Alameel, 35 percent to 27 percent. Maxey Scherr had 15 percent, followed by Harry Kim at 14 percent and Michael Fjetland at 9 percent. Voters are largely unfamiliar with those candidates; 74 percent initially expressed no opinion before being asked how they would vote if they had to decide now.
“This is what it looks like when you have a bunch of candidates, no infrastructure and no money,” (polling co-director Jim) Henson said. “The first person to raise some money and run some ads could really move this.”
I think Henson has that accurate; Alameel's voluminous mailings and TV ads should get him into the lead by the time all the votes are counted. But I warned a couple of my EVBB friends week before last that I feared an Alameel/Rogers runoff, and now it looks like I'm left to hope that the TexTrib's polling lives up to its comically bad reputation. However there's greater confidence to be found in their other numbers...
-- Abbott 47, Davis 36, Don't know 17. About right, I would say. Update: And yes, it is worth noting that this poll concluded before the Ted Nugent crap exploded (pun intended), so the effect of the most significant development of the entire campaign is not reflected here.
-- Cornyn 62, Stockman 16, everybody else in single digits that total 15. Also about right, and in defiance of what was released last week (somebody is awfully wrong, that's for sure). The Conservative News distribution probably doesn't save Stockman, either.
-- Dewhurst 37, Patrick 31, Staples, 17, Patterson 15. Nothing to quarrel over here, either. Remains to be seen whether Patrick's Ill Eagle flap hurts him; that news also broke after the poll concluded. But if something like these numbers hold, Dewhurst is toast in the runoff. Let's note this also.
The Republican nominee will face state Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio, who is unopposed in her primary. Van de Putte lagged behind each of the four Republicans in hypothetical general election matchups, trailing Dewhurst 44 percent to 32 percent, Patrick 41 percent to 32 percent, Staples 41 percent to 29 percent, and Patterson 41 percent to 30 percent. Undecided voters made up the difference in each race.
That seems like a sensible set of figures for late February, too. The only other result that so much as raises my eyebrow is Tea Party queen Debra Medina laying waste to the well-funded men in the R comptroller race.
There's going to be some crying at Glenn Hegar's watch party on Election Night. Hope he doesn't feel the urge to have to shoot anything.
Update: Socratic Gadfly with more on what this might mean for the Green Party Senate candidate, who also needs some free media but isn't well-positioned to take advantage of the publicity. And Charles breaks things down as well.
Oh lord on the Dems for Senate race. Time to look at the Greens ... who are offering a candidate with the nickname "Spiceybrown."
ReplyDeletePer the full Greens listing, I have emailed Ms. Sanchez with a version of the "wake up" I sent to Parmer a couple of weeks ago.
The GOP Lite Guv isn't breaking as I thought. I thought Patterson's kneecapping of Patrick over the Ill Eagles, as you put it, would make a diff.
Take note of the fact that the poll ended on February 17 -- moments before the Ted Nugent deal blew up, and a day or two before Patrick's problema grande.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I can tell in observing the local GOP, Abbott is damaged worse than Patrick (because the knife in his back has Patterson's fingerprints on it).
And yes, another opportunity for the Green to get some free media, which she will probably miss out on.