tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901123.post8020860519247990315..comments2024-03-15T03:20:38.106-05:00Comments on Brains and Eggs: SCOTUS tells lower court: Start over on TX mapsPDiddiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05851660342241127485noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901123.post-75455144937497700442012-01-21T06:48:11.347-06:002012-01-21T06:48:11.347-06:00A legislature also performed its function in 1964,...A legislature also performed its function in 1964, and reaffirmed that law in 2006. Does that not count for you?<br /><br />Of course this case wouldn't BE in court if it weren't perceived to be in violation of the LAW. Which this Court appears to want to overturn.<br /><br />What is more 'activist' than overturning settled law, legal precedent -- and legislative mandates like the VRA?<br /><br />This is the hypocrisy conservatives demonstrate in full view (that they cannot see).<br /><br />No more silliness, Matt. Greg's already worn my patience threadbare.PDiddiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05851660342241127485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3901123.post-60018174726901021472012-01-20T17:37:38.103-06:002012-01-20T17:37:38.103-06:00"Where's all that wailing from conservati..."Where's all that wailing from conservatives about 'activist judges' now?"<br /><br />I can't speak for conservatives in general, but I'm not a fan of the case being in court at all. Redistricting is a legislative function, and the Legislature performed its function.Matt Bramantihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13970003130199066596noreply@blogger.com